AI headshot generation offers no meaningful environmental advantage because AI-generated portraits do not reduce environmental strain. The creation of AI portraits depends on heavy-duty algorithms that consume vast computational capacity, which place enormous demand on power grids. The electricity fuelling these systems frequently comes from fossil fuels, worsening greenhouse gas output. The infrastructure supporting AI headshots imposes heavy ecological burdens through thermal management, component production, and 24. AI imagery doesn’t remove material demands—it simply relocates them. It merely shifts the environmental cost from photography equipment and related article studio operations to data infrastructure. Although AI may streamline some tasks, calling it environmentally beneficial ignores its total energy and material footprint. Genuine ecological advancement requires cutting power use, adopting clean energy, and reducing electronic overhead—not from repackaging resource-intensive processes as green innovations.