An insider claims that the next **Battlefield ** game, published by EA , will be returning the series to a present day setting and no one is surprised. The last two main games, Battlefield 1 and Battlefield V embraced period settings of World War 1 and World War 2, respectiv

As a result, Battlefield 5 's Firestorm became unplayable for many fans of the mode , effectively killing any interest in Battlefield 's attempt at battle royale. So many other battle royales just offered more enjoyable versions of the same core experience, so players abandoned the experience. Though partially due to the issues with Battlefield 5 's core multiplayer modes, Firestorm also seemed to lose support from the developers as they shifted focus to fixing other modes. Lack of support from both ends basically let Firestorm die off without so much as a whimper, which is a shame because there were certainly good bones in its structure despite its many shortcomi

The last two Battlefield games have been set in World War I and World War II respectively, and while both of those setting are rife with interesting moments, great locales , and mountains of fun weapons and vehicles, it seems that most FPS players are leaning back towards modern settings. Luckily, many players are also craving a level of realism that Battlefield typically delivers in spades, which means Battlefield 6 will be well positioned to fill that r

Battlefield has the capability of generating a successful battle royale game, but the support and care has to be there. Additionally, the franchise needs to bring something new or unique to the table to encourage players to opt-in. Where many aspects that made Battlefield unique before are now core portions of most battle royale games, there's still signature aspects of Battlefield that DICE can take advantage of. Regardless, if fans lost a little faith with Firestorm's failure , there's absolutely a chance for the next battle royale mode to be bet

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone are shaping up to be the biggest competition to Battlefield 6 , even with CoD 2020 and more on the horizon, and there is a lot of ground to cover for the next Battlefield to compete with what is arguably the most popular Call of Duty game ever in years. Call of Duty games have long been the industry standard for first person shooters, as any FPS title will inevitably be compared to the CoD game de jour, and big-budget shooters have to set themselves apart to make an impact. There are a few reasons that competing with Modern Warfare will be extra difficult for Battlefield

As mentioned above, Battlefield excels in realism, environmental destruction, sound design, and atmosphere. These are the few key features that Battlefield games have always prioritized, and those details have cemented the series as one that pushes the FPS genre forward time after time. Modern Warfare offers a fine-tuned, engaging, and addictive gameplay loop, but Battlefield provides a sense of immersion that is very rare in multiplayer games, let alone fast-paced shoot

If EA manages to impress gamers with the upcoming Battlefield game, and Call of Duty manages to keep its success with Black Ops Cold War , the debate of which FPS game to play could come back to light. Call of Duty will be challenged to keep coming up with more great ideas to keep their fans hooked. Firstly, though, Black Ops Cold War will release first sometime in November. _Battlefield 6 _ doesn't have an exact release date yet, and won't be coming out until sometime next year, so they have some time to plan and adjust if need

One area in particular that Battlefield definitely doesn’t need to focus on is the single player content. In fact, the franchise would frankly do better without it entirely. Arguably, the last good Battlefield single player story was Battlefield 1 , and even then, the campaign took a back seat to multiplayer just like every other modern Battlefield game that preceded it. Classic Battlefield titles are fondly remembered for their multiplayer experiences, and even though games in the past have had endearing characters like in Bad Company , they just haven't been exceptional. Multiplayer should be Battlefield 's primary directive, improving trademark modes like Conquest whilst implementing something new as w

There are some key aspects throughout Battlefield 's history that have contributed to the franchise becoming a bit mediocre. Defining features like destruction are no longer emphasized in a functional manner, while single-player is consistently forced into the experience, despite often being an afterthought for players who love Battlefield 's signature multiplayer. Battlefield is having an identity crisis, one that's not easily solved. Battlefield needs to hone in on what made the series so special in the first place and emphasize t

visit this web page link return to a present day setting seems favorable to fans, and inevitable, as the indicative tweet from Henderson got an enthusiastic response from his followers. It sounds like the developers, EA DICE , are taking some cues from one of the favorites of the series, and surely setting it in modern times will give players some advanced weapons and vehicles to test out. Battlefield 6 however, must make up for Battlefield V and deliver not just substantially more content, but a higher level of polish, a faster rate of post-launch content, higher player counts, and some innovation to compete with Modern Warfare which has given Call of Duty their best game in years - one that also supports cross-play and offers its battle royale modes for f