What's find more information impressive is how, even with all these elements of choice and weapon customization, guns still fit right in with the staples of the Create-A-Class system. Even amongst all of the possibilities of unfair advantages with Gunsmith, the system was balanced surprisingly well with perk distribution in multiplayer. Duplicates like faster reloading perks were adjusted and changed, and some existing perks were routed into different tiers to compensate for new weapon perks and attachments. Gunsmith's comprehensive customization allowed greater variety, largely without sacrificing competitive balance in the process. There have been some egregious exceptions in Modern Warfare like the GRAU , but for the most part the game has aptly balanced guns and perks quite w

Used to be that Battlefield was further ahead of the game in terms of weapon and equipment customization than Call of Duty was. Back when the game came out, Battlefield 3 introduced a weapon customization system that wasn't constrained to this one attachment, one playstyle method that Call of Duty swore by. Battlefield 3 allowed three particular customizations for most primary weapons in the game: sights/scopes, barrel types like silencers, and under-barrel attachments like grips or launchers. The game also allowed more flexibility in primary weapon choice, instead of Assault classes exclusively using assault rifles or Support classes only using light machine g

Battlefield is often a much more team-focused game, especially with its classes and specialists designed to fulfill a specific role in battle. Leveraging that with weapon customization adds some flexibility, but doesn't compromise the series' desire to make every player's role feel just as important as everyone else's. These classes encourage proper team composition and influences the way people play Battlefield , allowing them to clearly determine what their role is in the grand scheme of a Conquest or Rush match. But with a Gunsmith-like system, classes would feel less linear and give players options where previous games could not. Support members don't necessarily need to carry a big machine gun, or engineers don't need to be limited by close-range weap

Older Battlefield titles like Battlefield 3 had customization that was the closest thing to Modern Warfare 's Gunsmith before it existed. Gunsmith emphasizes Call of Duty 's desire not to compromise player preference with improper balancing. Even though there's been a few examples of overpowered guns/class builds, out of almost 50 guns throughout the entire game, it's crazy to think how balanced the weapon pool is with Gunsmith. Battlefield 6 would do well to observe and emulate the freedom achieved with Gunsmith's implementat

Modern Warfare and Warzone will certainly still be alive and kicking by the time that Battlefield 6 comes out. The developer has stated its commitment to keeping the current reboot around as the primary multiplayer Call of Duty experience for a long time yet, and the dev has made good on that commitment so far by continuing to release new content at a pace that even other triple-A developers struggle to keep up w

That being said, taking that prototype gameplay at face value, it's clear that EA is inferring these new improvements in player density/fidelity and destruction refinements will be Battlefield 's key factors of success for next-gen . That's certainly not a bad thing, as having large-scale battlefields that evoke a simulation of war is exactly what Battlefield has done best in the past. The only major problem is that Battlefield 6 will need to make sure that these new additions are not just window dressing. These systemic improvements/refinements have to be done with purpose, not just for the sake of being technically impressive without any semblance of gameplay importa

In a game like Battlefield , Gunsmith almost makes more sense to include than in Modern Warfare . Weapon balance in Battlefield has been spotty at times, but the expanded weapon customization introduced in Battlefield 3 compensated for that in a big way. If anything, expanding the systems that were introduced in Battlefield 3 and 4 into a Gunsmith-like system could help differentiate teammates/opponents from each other. Since every player picks one of four soldier classes, there'd be a lot of overlap between players' choice of weapon and equipment. Classes were constraining to a specific gameplay style, like how engineers were almost strictly close-range fighters with S

Then the Modern Warfare reboot implemented Gunsmith , which leveraged its perk systems with an obscene level of weapon customization. Players could choose up to five different attachments from a selection of nine categories, ranging from weapon muzzles to ammo capacities. The freedom in choice is massive, allowing for various builds on weapons that would either be invalidated or at least considered weaker in previous Call of Duty games. Loosening the attachment restrictions has lead to a wealth of variety in weapon choice and customizat